SIGN UP NOW - for your FREE Wellness Alerts

Get the most up-to-date, practical health advice from the UC Berkeley Wellness Letter
and the School of Public Health delivered straight to your inbox. Browse through the articles below and register now for your FREE Wellness Alerts. Just check off the boxes for the topics you are interested in, enter your e-mail address, and click "Send."

  • Choose text size:
  • A
  • A
  • A

Berkeley Wellness Alerts

February 16, 2010 | Comments: 3

Gain Strength, Lose Weight: Claims vs. Reality

Many books, websites, and personal trainers tout strength training as a fast way to shed pounds and lose body fat without dieting. Here’s a look at the claims.

CLAIM: Strength training increases resting metabolism (the rate at which the body burns calories), which means your body burns calories at a higher rate even when not exercising.

REALITY: True, but how much it goes up and for how long depends on how intensely you train and which muscles you work. Some studies have found that resting metabolism stays up for 14 hours or longer; others show it goes back to normal within an hour after exercising. But average gym-goers don’t work out long enough or hard enough to achieve any significant calorie-burning after-effect. More significant are the calories you burn while strength training. There is nothing magical about strength training itself: all exercise—particularly aerobic exercise—can increase metabolic rate to some degree.

CLAIM: Strength training builds muscle, and muscle burns far more calories than fat.

REALITY: Strength training builds muscle, but you have train strenuously and long term to add a significant amount. And even then, the impact on body weight is usually small. One pound of muscle typically burns five to eight calories a day, though this depends on many variables according to Dr. Robert Wolfe, at the University of Arkansas. (Don’t believe pie-in-the-sky claims that a pound of muscle burns a whopping 50 to 100 calories a day.) A man who does strength training three times 
a week for six months, for example, may gain four to six pounds of muscle. That would result in 20 to 48 extra calories burned a day—not much, considering that you need a deficit 
of about 500 calories a day to lose a pound a week.

Words to the wise: A balanced workout should include both a cardiovascular (aerobic) workout and strength training exercises. But if your primary goal is to lose weight, focus mainly on aerobic exercise (such as running, biking, skating, or brisk walking) four or more days a week for at least 45 minutes. This burns more calories and is more likely to significantly boost your metabolic rate afterwards than strength training.

Read more on this topic

Comments

Post a comment

Wellness Alerts registered users may post comments and share experiences here at their own discretion. We regret that questions on individual health concerns to the Wellness Alerts cannot be answered in this space.

The views expressed here do not constitute medical advice, and do not represent the position of Medizine, LLC, which has no responsibility for any comments posted on this site.

I am 89 years of age. I would like to reduce my weight by 10 -15 lbs. I am unable to walk for 30 minutes per day due to weak knees - What other method is available?

Posted by: Frank Chesen | February 22, 2010 10:02 AM

When one exercises, the thermal efficiency of the human body at doing work should be taken into account. As best as I have been able to determine so far, it is about 40%. An automobile, as a comparison, is about 20% thermally efficient. 40% is a remarkably good number. Formally, thermal efficiency is the heat taken from an energy source of higher temperature minus the waste heat delivered to an energy sink of lower temperature, that difference, divided by the energy from the higher temperature source. Oh, and factor in 100 to make it a percent. This, more casually stated is the work done divided by the calories used to do the work. If I lift 4.186 kilograms up one meter, I do 4.186 joules of work. The conversion to heat (using Joule's mechanical equivalent of heat constant, 4.186 joules per calorie), then the heat equivalent of the lifting work I did is 1 calorie. Now since I am 40% efficient, my muscles used 1 calorie/.4

Posted by: Unknown | February 27, 2010 5:36 PM

I don't see why an 89-year-old would want to lose 10-15 pound.

http://www.fitclick.com/weight_loss_tips

Posted by: JoeHeller | July 16, 2010 11:55 AM

Post a Comment

New to Wellness Alerts? Sign Up

  • Your e-mail address will not be posted

Already Registered? Log in